The Journal of Contemporary China publishes articles of theoretical and policy research and research notes, as well as book reviews, related to contemporary Chinese affairs. It is the only English language journal edited in North America that provides exclusive information about contemporary Chinese affairs for scholars, businessmen and government policy-makers. It publishes articles of theoretical and policy research and research notes, as well as book reviews.
The journal's fields of interest include:
- political science
- law culture
- international relations
- sociology and other social sciences and humanities.
Suisheng Zhao, Executive Director
Center for China-U.S. Cooperation, Josef Korbel School of International Studies, University of Denver
Published by Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group
ISSN Print 1067-0564
ISSN Online 1469-9400
Back issues of the JCC are searchable by subject matter.
Articles by Subject (pdf)
Please note that this document is a work in progress. If you have suggestions or requests for an article to fall under a different category, please contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org with your desired edits.
Selina Ho, "River Politics: China's Policies in the Mekong and Brahmaputra in Comparative Perspective," 23(85) (2014)
China manages its transboundary rivers as a subset of its broader relations with other riparian states. This results in discernible differences in the way China approaches its international river systems. Although there is a limit to the extent of Chinese cooperation, in relative terms China is more cooperative in the Mekong than in the Brahmaputra. To China, Southeast Asian states are part of a hierarchical system where it stands at the apex. While problems exist, there are deep linkages between them, which help foster collaboration in the Mekong...read more
Scott Kennedy, "The Myth of the Beijing Consensus," 19(65) (2010)
The widely touted concept of the 'Beijing Consensus' (BC) suggests that China's economic success violates conventional theories of development and offers developing countries an alternative vision to the Washington Consensus (WC). Although ambitious, the original conception of the BC is not up to the task of being a worthwhile competitor to the alternative model from which its name was coined, not because of the WC's apparent worthiness, but rather because the BC is a misguided and inaccurate summary of China's actual reform experience...read more