|
1
|
- Office of Research and
- Sponsored Programs
- Thursday
- April 10, 2008
- Renaissance Room South
- Mary Reed Building
- 2199 South University Boulevard
|
|
2
|
- Introduction
- ORSP Project Administration
- New Department Assignments
- Grants.gov Adobe update
- Administrative and Clerical Salary Costs
- Update on NSF Cost-share requirements
- Establishing and Managing Subcontracts and Consulting Agreements
- Enhancing Public Access to Archived Publications Resulting from
NIH-funded Research
- ORSP Grants Accounting
- Expenditures (Direct pays, P-card)
- No Sales Tax
- Meals Document as official functions:
- Payroll
- ORSP Research Compliance and Education
- Research Compliance
- DU Institutional Committees
- Institutional Committee Dates
- DU e-Protocol
- ORSP Education
- Partnering with HR to coordinate education
- DU CITI
- ORSP Events 2007-2008
|
|
3
|
- ORSP is the universitys office authorized to enter into agreements with external sponsors for the
purposes of research, instruction, or other activities.
- Includes grants, contracts, cooperative agreements, etc., where there is
a specific expectation of reciprocal value.
- With all governmental entitieswhether direct or flow-through.
- With industry or non-profit organizations where there is a requirement
for oversight, detailed financial invoicing or reporting, audit, or
compliance with regulatory statutes (e.g. protection of human subjects
in research, care and use of animals in research, biosafety concerns,
conflicts of interest, etc.).
- ORSP will provide institutional signature that binds the university and
provides assurances of compliance with all appropriate laws and
regulations.
|
|
4
|
- To: The DU Community
- From: Jim Moran, Vice Provost for Graduate Studies and Research
- Ed Harris, Vice Chancellor for University Advancement
- Date: September 24, 2007
- Re: Looking for Funding Support for Your Program or Project?
- Are you seeking external support for a program or project? There are two departments within the
University of Denver that can assist you in obtaining that fundingUniversity
Advancement (UA) and the Office of Research and Sponsored Programs
(ORSP). Any official proposal
must be submitted through one of these offices. The attached guidelines will help you
to determine whether the funding is considered a charitable contribution
(to be processed through UA) or a grant or contract (to be processed
through ORSP). Both offices will
assist you in obtaining and interpreting donor or sponsor guidelines.
- University Advancement (UA) will coordinate proposals so that we have
the highest possibility of an award.
Such coordination allows DU to establish better relations with
our donors and to avoid inappropriate and embarrassing submissions of
duplicate or ineligible proposals.
In rare cases, foundations allow multiple submissions, but most
will accept only one proposal per year from an institution. UA is especially sensitive to local
funders, most of who have recently completed campaign pledges and are
primarily interested in institutional projects approved by senior
administration or chosen by the foundations themselves. UA will alert you to these
restrictions and guide you to the best possible sources of funding and
will also help to assure that your proposal conforms to the donors
guidelines. They will also ensure
that approval to proceed is received from your division. To avoid any conflicts, please call
Leigh Elliott at UA prior to initiating any contact (phone calls,
letters of inquiry, proposals) with any foundation.
- UA will also be expanding the University's outreach into the corporate
arena. The University has
initiated a program to enhance existing and develop new relationships
with corporations beyond funding programs or contracts. Corporations make charitable
contributions from marketing and philanthropic budgets, contribute
in-kind goods, lend executives and match gifts from employees who choose
to support the University.
Although no goods or services are exchanged, a growing number of
corporations have high expectations for recognition. Before approaching a private
corporation, please contact Leigh (17469, leigh.elliott@du.edu) to
discuss your project.
- The Office of Research and Sponsored Programs (ORSP) will work with you
to seek non-charitable support from government agencies and other
entities. ORSP can direct you to
funding opportunities and guide you through the maze of requirements in
preparing proposals and administering awards. When a sponsor awards a grant or
contract, ORSP will assist you in meeting the terms and conditions of
the awardsuch as providing financial reports, and facilitating any
audit or other compliance requirements.
Because of regulatory and compliance requirements, it is
especially important to work through ORSP if your project entails the
use of human subjects, animals, or may result in patentable technology. ORSP will provide institutional
signature that binds the university and provides assurance of compliance
with all appropriate laws and regulations.
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
- New Department Assignments
- Grants.gov Adobe update
- Administrative & Clerical Salary Costs
- Update on NSF Cost-share requirements
- Establishing and managing subcontracts and consulting agreements
- Enhancing Public Access to Archived Publications Resulting from
NIH-funded Research
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
- TRANSITION TO ADOBE
- In an effort to better serve the grant community and increase site
accessibility, Grants.gov has committed to transitioning from the
PureEdge-based application system to an Adobe Reader-based application
system.
- The Adobe Reader applications offer more functionality and expansive
system compatibility. The Adobe Reader applications are compatible with
most operating systems including all Windows (Vista, Windows 2007), Mac
OSX (Tiger, Leopard), Linux and UNIX.
- Timelines are being developed by each agency, and each agency will post
in Adobe upon successful testing.
- April 1, 2008: NEW PureEdge Opportunity Posting Cut Off and Open
PureEdge Opportunities Migrated to Adobe
- June 30, 2008: PureEdge Application Submission Cut Off
- Adobe Application Submissions Only After June 30
- July 3 5, 2008: Remaining Open PureEdge Opportunities Migrated to
Adobe by Grants.gov
- December 30, 2008: 2006 PureEdge System Retired
- To view an animated tutorial on completing a form with Adobe Reader
8.1.1 go to http://www.grants.gov/flash/AdobeReaderApplicationTutorial_skin.swf
|
|
9
|
- OMB Circular A-21 prohibits direct charging of administrative or
clerical staff salaries except when defined as a major project
(below).
- Exhibit C -- Examples of "major project" where direct
charging of administrative or clerical staff salaries may be
appropriate.
- Large, complex programs such as General Clinical Research Centers,
Primate Centers, Program Projects, environmental research centers,
engineering research centers, and other grants and contracts that
entail assembling and managing teams of investigators from a number of
institutions.
- Projects which involve extensive data accumulation, analysis and
entry, surveying, tabulation, cataloging, searching literature, and
reporting (such as epidemiological studies, clinical trials, and
retrospective clinical records studies).
- Projects that require making travel and meeting arrangements for large
numbers of participants, such as conferences and seminars.
- Projects whose principal focus is the preparation and production of
manuals and large reports, books and monographs (excluding routine
progress and technical reports).
- Projects that are geographically inaccessible to normal departmental
administrative services, such as research vessels, radio astronomy
projects, and other research fields sites that are remote from campus.
- Individual projects requiring project-specific database management;
individualized graphics or manuscript preparation; human or animal
protocols; and multiple project-related investigator coordination and
communications.
- These examples are not exhaustive nor are they intended to imply that
direct charging of administrative or clerical salaries would always be
appropriate for the situations illustrated in the examples. For
instance, the examples would be appropriate when the costs of such
activities are incurred in unlike circumstances, i.e., the actual
activities charged direct are not the same as the actual activities
normally included in the institution's facilities and administrative
(F&A) cost pools or, if the same, the indirect activity costs are
immaterial in amount. It would be inappropriate to charge the cost of
such activities directly to specific sponsored agreements if, in
similar circumstances, the costs of performing the same type of
activity for other sponsored agreements were included as allocable
costs in the institution's F&A cost pools. Application of
negotiated predetermined F&A cost rates may also be inappropriate
if such activity costs charged directly were not provided for in the
allocation base that was used to determine the predetermined F&A
cost rates.
|
|
10
|
- The National Science Board (NSB) has recommended cost sharing on some
National Science Foundation (NSF) Programs. According to the NSB, removing
mandatory cost sharing on these programs hampered the ability of these
programs to achieve their strategic goals and, in some cases, virtually
eliminated the incentive for participation by industry.
- The report offers six targeted recommendations:
- NSF should define and communicate overarching principles to guide the
application of mandatory cost-sharing, to include specific goals and
expected outcomes of its application.
- NSF should continue to employ OMB Circular A-110 to define cost-sharing
and should communicate all changes to the NSF cost-sharing policy to
its stakeholders to eliminate the confusion that surrounded cost
sharing in the past.
- NSF should enhance its training of program officers to avoid unintended
implicit or explicit requests for voluntary cost sharing/institutional
commitment during the budget negotiation process. Further NSF should continue to
emphasize that merit review is founded on quality of work to be
performed with cost sharing (where applicable) as an eligibility not a
merit review- requirement.
- NSF should reinstate mandatory cost sharing for programs that achieve
one or more of the following large-scale and/or long-term strategic
goals:
- building regional, state, or institutional capacity
- creating meaningful partnerships with industry
- promoting the sustainability of projects beyond NSF funding
- encouraging technology transfer for local economic development
- NSF should continue to communicate the requirements of tracking and
reporting mandatory cost sharing to all institutions to which it
provides funding
- NSF should periodically and systematically review its cost-sharing
policies and their impacts and report its findings to the National
Science Board
- For more information, visit: www.nsf.gov/nsb/commitees/tskforce_cs.jsp
|
|
11
|
- DETERMINING STATUS OF SUBCONTRACTOR / CONSULTANT
- Subcontractor (organization) or Consultant (individual) who
participates in meeting the goals of a grant or contract originally
awarded to DU, providing substantive contribution towards program goals
and decisions.
- Performance measured against program objectives
- Makes programmatic decisions
- Responsible for compliance
- Carries out program-- not just to provide goods and services
- INSTITUTION IS REQUIRED TO DETERMINE:
- Eligibility of subcontractor/consultant
- Subcontractor/consultant has appropriate financial systems to manage
awards
- Subcontractor/consultant has no outstanding audit issues that will
negatively impact overall project.
- MONITORING PERFORMANCE OF SUBCONTRACTOR/CONSULTANT
- The Principal Investigator has primary responsibility for technical
monitoring throughout the life of the sub-agreement not just at the
end
- Receiving and reviewing progress reports
- Reviewing and approving invoices and financial reports
- Regular contact with subcontractor/consultant and appropriate
inquiries concerning program activities
- Revising scope of work and/or budget and time frame as necessary for
successful completion of the project
- CLOSEOUT OF SUB-AGREEMENT
- PI reviews and approves required deliverables
- PI reviews and approves final invoice
- PI reviews final technical report
- PI verifies and includes subcontractors/consultants final technical
report in his/her report to sponsor.
|
|
12
|
- The Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2008 (PL 110-161 ) includes a
statutory requirement to enhance public access to publications that were
funded from NIH-sponsored research. The policy requires submission of
final, peer-reviewed manuscripts accepted for publication on/after April
7, 2008 resulting from NIH-supported research with current, active
funding (grants funded since October 2007; contracts funded on/after
April 7, 2008).
- Specifics
- The NIH Public Access Policy applies to all peer-reviewed articles
that arise, in whole or in part, from direct costs funded by NIH, or
from NIH staff, that are accepted for publication on or after April 7,
2008.
- The electronic version of the final, peer-reviewed manuscript must be
made publicly available through the National Library of Medicines
PubMed Central no later than 12 months after the official date of
publication.
- Institutions and investigators are responsible for ensuring that any
publishing or copyright agreements concerning submitted articles fully
comply with this Policy.
- PubMed Central (PMC) is the NIH digital archive of full-text,
peer-reviewed journal articles. Its content is publicly
accessible and integrated with other databases (see: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/).
- The final, peer-reviewed manuscript includes all graphics and
supplemental materials that are associated with the article.
- Beginning May 25, 2008, anyone submitting an application, proposal or
progress report to the NIH must include the PMC or NIH Manuscript
Submission reference number when citing applicable articles that arise
from their NIH funded research. This policy includes applications
submitted to the NIH for the May 25, 2008 due date and subsequent due
dates.
- IMPORTANT NOTES:
- PIs with on-going NIH grants may need to report from prior year
activities.
- Preserving their copyrights in any agreements linked to NIH-supported
projects will be an important negotiating point in order to meet this
new statutory requirement.
- ORSP will assist in submitting manuscripts to PubMed Central.
|
|
13
|
|
|
14
|
- No sales tax in Colorado
- Tell vendor that this is a tax-exempt purchase.
- (Exception: Restaurant expense
may include tax.)
- Tax exempt number 98-00574
- Imprinted on DU Purchasing Card
- Tax exempt certificate located at http://www.du.edu/purchasing
- Click on Doing Business with DU
- Click on About Us
- Choose Colorado State Sales Tax Exemption or City of Denver Sales
Tax Exemption
- Meals
- Document as official functions.
- Must include:
- Purpose of meeting
- Names of attendees
- Research Subjects may be exempt due to confidentiality requirements.
- Itemized receipt
|
|
15
|
- GOAL: Leave balances for
monthly-paid, leave-eligible grants employees will be available through
- My Web (for employee)
- Banner PEALEAV (for department administrators)
- Revised Forms & Process:
- Revised forms will replace salmon timesheets and green timesheets.
- Forms will be used for:
- Monthly Staff (time and leave taken)
- Monthly Faculty and Graduate Research Assistants (time only)
- See Appendix for draft of revised forms.
- Form to be routed through department timekeeper for Banner entry of
leave taken, then forwarded to ORSP for labor re-distribution.
- Timetable:
- 4/2/08: Letters requesting
verification of leave balances as of 3/31/08 sent out to employees of
pilot departments.
- 4/15/08: Signed verification
letters due to ORSP.
- 4/20/08: Leave balances as of
3/31/08 for pilot departments are input into Banner by ORSP.
- 4/24/08: Begin rollout of
department time entry of leave taken (through PHATIME).
- April: Physics, Biology (pilot
departments)
- May: Bridge Project, Butler
Institute, Computer Science, Engineering
- June: Psychology, Chemistry,
DRI, ERI, Education, GSIS, RLP
|
|
16
|
- ORSP Research Compliance
- Updates on DU Institutional Committees
- Institutional Committee Meeting Dates
- DU e-Protocol update
- ORSP Education
- Partnering with HR
- DU CITI
|
|
17
|
- IRB (Institutional Review Board for the Protection of Human Subjects)
- Chair, Dr. Dennis Wittmer (DU) will be stepping down.
- Dr. Susan Sadler has been appointed chair effective 6/1/08.
- IACUC (Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee)
- New DU Laboratory Animal Facility opened April 2008.
- Located in the Seeley G. Mudd Building
- Facility director, Dr. Joe Angleson
- New Procedures include:
- Per-diem charges for animal care
- Centralized ordering and receiving
- Required training and education
- DU ID restricted access
- IBC (Institutional Biosafety Committee)
- Interim Chair, Dr. Ron Gill
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
- Implementation is going smoothly.
- Web-based application provides service to DUs research community and
institutional committee members
- Has allowed for continuous improvements in oversight processes not
previously possible with a paper-based review mechanism.
- User Survey
- The first user survey was very positive and will help us to continue to
enhance our own policies and procedures.
- e-Protocol Access Request Form
- First time users of the e-Protocol database system must submit an
Electronic Access Request Form. After submitting this one-time request
form, the user will receive a username and temporary password granting
them access to the e-Protocol system.
- The request form can be found at the following address: www.du.edu/orsp/compliance.html.
- Education and Training Sessions are available.
- Please visit our website or contact our office. You may also visit and
register online at www.du.edu/hr/training
|
|
20
|
|
|
21
|
- Workshops offered
- IRB Workshops
- eProtocol Workshops
- ORSP Workshops
- NCURA TV
- Special events
- Workshops by special arrangement
- Partnering with HR to announce educational opportunities and register
- You may visit the ORSP website for more information or visit the HR
Training and Development webpage for courses and registration at: http://www.du.edu/hr/training/
|
|
22
|
- Blackboard and Collaborative Institutional Training Initiative (CITI)
- Human Research Protection Program will move from Blackboard to
CITI. Faculty, Staff and
Students that received their certification via Blackboard will not have
to retake the HRP training; however they may find a visit to the
University of Denver CITI useful.
The DU CITI web modules include education modules for:
- Human Research Protections
- Social, Behavioral and Educational Research
- Biomedical
- Internet Research
- International Research
- Lab Animal Course
- Essentials of IACUC
- Working with Rodents
- HIPAA and Privacy
- Responsible Conduct of Research
- Data ownership and plagiarism
- COI and Commitments
- Research Misconduct
- Authorship and Publications
- Mentoring
- Peer-review
- Collaborations
|
|
23
|
- Thursday, April 17, 2008, 2:00 4:00 pm
- ORSP Workshop #5: Life-cycle of
an AwardNegotiating & accepting an award, Commitments &
deliverables, Managing the program and funding, Reporting, Audits, and
more
- TBD Watch for Announcements
- NCURA TV (half-day pre-recorded workshops):
- Managing Cost Issues
- Effective Proposal Development
- Complex Agreements
- Good Customer Service for Research Administrators: How to Support the
Research Endeavor at Your Institution
- _________________________________________________
- All events will be held in Renaissance Room South of the Mary Reed
Building.
- To register: Send an email to ORSP@du.edu
- _________________________________________________
|
|
24
|
- The Western Section of the International Society of Research
Administrators is excited to announce and invite you to participate in
the upcoming 2008 Annual meeting "Research Elevated: Mile High
Opportunities" to be held in Denver, Colorado at the Denver
Marriott City Center June 7 June 11, 2008
- _______________________________________
- To find out more about this conference and register, please visit:
- http://srainternational.org/SRA03/template/tntbWsa08.cfm?id=1796
- _______________________________________
|
|
25
|
- DRAFT Timesheet Forms for Grants Employees:
- Monthly Staff (Benefited)
- Monthly Faculty and GRAs
|