|

Interview with Tom Knecht
Linda Tate
Tom Knecht is an assistant professor of political science at DU. He
holds a bachelors degree in political science from Stanford University
and a PhD in political science from the University of California-Santa
Barbara. His research interests include American foreign policy, public
opinion, and the American presidency. His book, Polling the Reins of
Power, is currently under review. In Fall 2010, he will take a
position as assistant professor of political science at Westmont College
in Santa Barbara, California.
Where did you go to school?
I did my undergraduate degree at Stanford
and my graduate work at the University of California-Santa Barbara. I
was in political science all along. At Stanford, I was in a program
cross-listed between history and political science. I saw myself as a
history major until I counted and saw that I was a political science
major. As an undergraduate, I didnt see a huge divide as a discipline,
but in graduate school I did.
Ive always been interested in the questions political science looks at
questions of war and peace, questions of how people arrive at the
decisions they do. I enjoy college students and the process of teaching.
Teaching is about as rewarding as you can possibly get.
What courses do you teach at DU?
I teach a bunch American Presidency,
American Congress, Interest Groups, a Core course on American Public
Opinion. We look at this in terms of political context and in terms of
social issues sociology, psychology, public opinion, and marketing. I
teach a simulation class on American Government each student plays a
member of the House of Representatives for the quarter. I teach a
first-year seminar titled Politics of Sports. I teach a SOCS Foundation
course on Power and Justice.
What kinds of writing assignments do you incorporate in these
courses?
I have a lot of varied writing assignments
from traditional research papers to short reaction pieces. In my
simulation class, students draft bills and write press releases.
Students like these assignments. When writing a bill for this course,
you have to proofread your bill and include everything from soup to
nuts. You cant get the bill through the committee otherwise this
simulates the committee process and the floor vote. In my first-year
seminar, students work on a cooperative learning assignment. They take
notes on readings and make presentations. They then write up a group
response. Writing is a collaborative endeavor. This is such a hard skill
to teach, and we really need it in the academy.
What are your research interests? To what degree do you have to be an
active writer to accomplish your research goals?
I work as a collaborative writer in my
research. Im working on a paper with Lisa Martinez [DU assistant
professor of sociology and criminology] on homelessness. Lisa and I are
on the same page shes great to work with. Currently, Im working with
a co-author on academic tolerance this piece of writing is in the
infant stages. I have also written quite a bit with students. In my
Participation and Representation course, students could write a big
research paper, and I would come on as co-author and try to publish it.
Three students took me up on this offer. We asked, Can we predict who
will vote for a third-party candidate? Weve presented this research at
the Midwest Political Science Association meeting.
Whats challenging about writing collaboratively?
Deadlines people are busy. Setting a firm
deadline you can both work with is challenging. Its also challenging
when your co-author has different ideas than you do, but that can also
be a tremendous opportunity. When you reach an impasse, it opens up
enormous opportunities. You always think its going to be easier because
you can divide the labor, but its actually really demanding. Someone
else is truly invested and can give you feedback you wouldnt get
otherwise. It enriches your writing. You have to pick and choose your
partners carefully. You have to have respect for each other.
When you visited my Honors Writing class in the spring, you told them
that, as an undergraduate, you were drawn to political science for the
ideas you could explore but that when you got to graduate school you
discovered that your research would have to focus much more fully on
quantitative research. Can you say more about that?
Political science is becoming much more
diverse when it comes to methodology and epistemology. My training as an
undergraduate was positivist in epistemology. My graduate training was
empirical. This was a big shock after coming from a program where
questions of methodology were secondary. At first, I went into it
kicking and screaming. I didnt understand how to apply a non-normative
framework to a normative endeavor like politics. My research has been
both quantitative and qualitative. My research has been in the
mainstream of the discipline. Ive become very comfortable working in
the empirical tradition.
Do you teach students non-normative, non-positivist approaches to DU
students?
In my Public Opinion class, students
actually go out and do polls for an organization. They write a survey,
administer the survey, write up the results, share with the community
partner. The most difficult writing youll do is survey writing. The
final project is the report on the survey some of them write 50-page
reports.
Tell me about Polling the Reins of Power, the book youre
currently writing.
It looks at whether presidents listen to our
opinions or whether they [the presidents] shape our opinions. It uses a
mixed method both quantitative data and qualitative data. What
motivates the study is that there is a really strong correlation between
public opinion and foreign policy. This could be due to three reasons:
1) Presidents use a bully pulpit.
2) Presidents just happen to have the same opinion [as the public].
3) Presidents abandon what they want and listen to the public.
Each of the causal pathways can explain the strong correlation. Instead
of preference, I look at public attention and it turns out that there
are fairly predictable periods of public attention.
What advice do you have for students as they write in your courses
and other political science courses?
Work on it! Writing is a skill that you
really need to perfect and hone through practice, repetition, diligent
study. The expectations I have for student papers and the expectations
they hold are very different. The key variable is the students
willingness to work at it.
The Point Front Page
|

 |